California Politicians Required to Wear Lobbyist Donor Logo's - BuzzNation
Politics

California Politicians Required to Wear Lobbyist Donor Logo’s

Page 1 of 1

The idea may soon be a fact for California legislators, even popular memes calling to wear the symbols of the corporate patrons have circulated the net for quite long time. In another week, a possible ballot measure, submitted in October to the Office of the Attorney General, is likely to get outline and title for the 2016 election, meaning its supporters will soon not be unable to gather signatures as a way to ensure its official position on the vote. The proposed law would require candidates and legislators to sport the symbols of groups that give money for their campaigns.

As the advocacy group that started the measure, California Isn’t for Sale, muses:
“Now picture if on his coat, he was wearing BP symbols, and Chevron, Shell – some of his top ten donor’s.”

John Cox, the vote’s patron, is an entrepreneur from San Diego and longtime supporter of reforming the California legislature, which can be rife with corruption and scandal. The legislature was harassed with hearings and numerous ethics violations, and members of the governing body flew to speak to union managers and corporate executives, who financed the trip by funneling funds by way of a non-profit organization.

“The group gets its cash from about 24 things, many putting up at least $7,500.
Cox’s activism has been, inspired by this on-going political climate in Sacramento, California’s capital for a long time. Cox encouraged the concept of electing more legislators to provide more direct representation to the big voting public in California before starting the symbol initiative. Considering most voters nevertheless, Cox developed California IsN’t for Sale.

By the end of August, the group formed a demonstration setting up lifesize cutouts of over 121 state legislators. They were all decorated using their corporate donors’ symbols, from 711 to AT&T and Walmart. The protest was well-received, attracting on critical attention from passersby as well as the lawmakers themselves.

By the end of October, a request to include the measure was formally submitted by Cox.

After filing the request, Cox said, “It is a corrupt system and it is got to change,” adding that “if they do not take any cash, they will not have to wear any decals.” He described the aim wasn’t to obstruct strike corporations or lawmakers, unions, and collective bargaining, but instead, to raise consciousness about the influence in politics of big money. “I believe a lot of these, the majority of these, are likely great folks.

The group declared late Sunday it’s “preparing to receive title and outline in another week and will start gathering signatures across California.” They they’ll satisfy the prerequisite. are assured need to receive 365,000 signatures to secure a place on the 2016 ballot, and As Ryan Smith, a coordinator for California Isn’t for Sale, “We Have received a boatload of support in the community up to now. This thought is loved by folks. Their whole lives they’ve felt weak and abused by politicians; our measure places the power back in their own control.”

The initiative has attracted mixed reviews. Smith said the organization has received furious e-mails from some legislators demanding the group cease using lifesize cutouts of the picture.

Though assembly member Rocky Chavez recognized the legislature wants more foil, he asserted that “to have everyone decked out like race car drivers will be a circus component which would not actually help the people.” He proposed requiring legislators and nominees to record their top ten donors on their sites, though this would probably mean much less exposure than showing them on the ground of the legislature.

Requested about Chavez’s claim the proposed law would produce a “circus component,” Smith replied, “You understand what is a circus? That politicians have no responsibility after and can take cash from corporations and unions. It is an entire joke. If Mr. Chavez does not enjoy this, I ‘ve a fantastic answer for him: quit requiring cash. Problem solved, circus averted!”

As California Isn’t for Sale’s site claims, “Big money in politics has gone too much. Ordinary citizens do not have a voice and it is time that transforms. Smith says the proposed ballot measure is the first of several measures the group will start over the coming years, “all using the aim of ending political corruption in our state.”

Page 1 of 1
Click to comment
To Top